cs4k-cover-geese2.jpg

We’re all Space Aliens! Not!!

300px Meteor Deep from Igdir Were all Space Aliens! Not!!

Meteor Deep from Igdir

From the archives:

I was going to do a post talking about Study the Word’s statistical probability of Abiogenesis happening.  But, it turns out that Sir Fred Hoyle, the mathematician who claimed that life is sure to happen if you just give it 4.5 billion years, isn’t too popular with mainstream Evolutionists.  They can’t deny his numbers, but they dare not admit that Earth should only now be forming its first microbes.

However, with Sir Hoyle’s help, scientists have again picked up the ancient belief in life from space.  This theory now has an official title, called Exogenesis (life from outside), or more popularly Panspermia which means “life everywhere.”  This doesn’t mean that they believe in space-travelling aliens dropping off protozoa on earth, but that the specialized ingredients for life came from meteorites and such.

Here’s a sample of what they’re saying from Physics of the Universe, “An alternative to Earthly abiogenesis is “exogenesis”, the hypothesis that primitive life may have originally formed extraterrestrially, either in space or on a nearby planet such as Mars. Such ideas have had many eminent supporters over the years, including Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the structure of the DNA molecule, and the astrophysicist Sir Fred Hoyle among others. These theories may go some way to explaining the presence of life on Earth so soon after the planet had cooled down, with apparently very little time for prebiotic evolution.”

They know how ridiculous belief in Abiogenesis is, but ANYTHING is better for them than believing in a Creator God!

You could do a web search and find page after page of links to stories about Panspermia.  Here are a couple to give you a taste:
300px KT Meteor Were all Space Aliens! Not!! The Australian News: Life came from outer space, says NASA “NASA scientists had previously found a disproportionate amount of the left-handed form of isovaline, an amino acid, in a meteorite sample. The latest study confirms that the previous sample was not a one-off. “This tells us our initial discovery wasn’t a fluke, that there really was something going on in the asteroids where these meteorites came from that favours the creation of left-handed amino acids,” said Daniel Glavin, from NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Centre in Greenbelt, Maryland.

The scientists believe that early in its history Earth was bombarded with meteorites containing left-handed amino acids, which led to the genesis of life about four billion years ago.”

The Independent: We’re all aliens… how humans began life in outer space “Charles Darwin solved the mystery of life’s wondrous diversity with his theory of natural selection. But even he was flummoxed by the ultimate mystery of mysteries: what led to the origin of life itself?  In trying to answer the problem, scientists have turned to the stars, or at least the “builders’ rubble” of meteorites and comets left over from the formation of our solar system some five billion years ago. These space rocks, they believe, could help to explain why life began here on Earth.”

News Wales: Red rain may prove life came from outer space   “Professor Chandra Wickramasinghe and his colleague, the late Sir Fred Hoyle, argued that life on earth was originated by comets. Although greeted with scepticism at first, this theory is becoming recognised as eminently plausible.  Recent discoveries of complex organic molecules in comets and interstellar dust clouds have provided striking evidence of life originating on a greater cosmic scale than just on Earth. Microbiologists are also finding properties of bacteria that show they can survive the harshest conditions of space.

ABC Science: Life elements came from outer space  “A meteorite found in Antarctica adds extra impact to the theory that the essential building blocks of life on Earth came from outer space, say US scientists.”

What does all this mean?  As the Independent points out, one of the biggest flaws of the theory of Evolution is how do you get the whole process started in the first place?  The belief in non-life producing life goes against everything we’ve ever seen.

And after all that, they still want to make fun of our crazy belief in God!

Sucking his thumb and waving Were all Space Aliens! Not!!

A 3D ultrasound of a baby at 17 weeks.

For thou hast possessed my reins: thou hast covered me in my mother’s womb.  I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and wonderfully made: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.  My substance was not hid from thee, when I was made in secret, and curiously wrought in the lowest parts of the earth.  Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them.  How precious also are thy thoughts unto me, O God! how great is the sum of them!  If I should count them, they are more in number than the sand: when I awake, I am still with thee. 

Surely thou wilt slay the wicked, O God: depart from me therefore, ye bloody men.  For they speak against thee wickedly, and thine enemies take thy name in vain. Psalm 139:13-20

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

Louis Pasteur’s Swan Flask Experiments

300px Experiment Pasteur English Louis Pasteurs Swan Flask Experiments

Illustration of swan-necked flask experiment used by Louis Pasteur to test the hypothesis of spontaneous generation.

Way back, I wrote about how Evolutionists still believe in spontaneous generation, just giving it a new name: Abiogenesis. That post mentioned Pasteur a bit and included a picture of one of his experiments using “swan flasks”. Ever since then, I’ve had a trickle of people searching for info about Pasteur’s flasks.

Eventually, I got so curious I did some searching of my own. Here’s what I found:

300px Louis Pasteur%2C foto av F%C3%A9lix Nadar Louis Pasteurs Swan Flask Experiments

Louis Pasteur

Darwin’s Origin of Species book retelling the ancient idea of biological evolution was first printed in 1859. From the beginning, many people recognized what believing in life creating itself would do to Christianity and human equality, including Louis Pasteur.

Just a few years before, Pasteur had begun studying how microbes (tiny living creatures like bacteria and yeast) were the cause of food spoilage. He was in a perfect place to understand what Darwin was claiming and the scientific truth about life. He was soon busy showing how impossible the #1 necessary step of Evolution was: getting life to start in the first place.

Others had tried to show whether microbes just popped into being whenever things were right or not. But no one really knew how these invisible things worked and they made mistakes like letting air in or not heating things enough to kill everything.

We all understand what Pasteur was the first to figure out: you don’t have to touch something dirty to get germs on you. Bacteria and viruses float around in the air ready to settle into a pleasant environment like your lungs and nose.

Pasteur proved this when he managed to catch some microbes from the air in cotton. He cultured the cotton and it grew the same kinds of microbes as usual. Now it was time to see if stopping those airborne germs stopped life from starting in a flask.

Here’s how Pasteur did it:

300px Coldecygne.svg Louis Pasteurs Swan Flask Experiments

  • First he made flasks with bent, “swan”, necks. This was to trap all the organisms in the air before they could get through
  • He filled the bottom of the flask with some broth microbes liked to grow in
  • Then he boiled it to kill anything already there
  • While it was still hot, he melted the glass at the tip of the neck to keep microbes from getting in

nothing grew in the broth

  • Even when the sealed end was broken off, the swan neck did its job

still nothing grew in the broth

  • Finally, Pasteur tipped the flask to expose the broth to the trapped microbes

sure enough, it started to culture just like usual

300px KT Meteor Louis Pasteurs Swan Flask ExperimentsAs you know, Pasteur’s experiments were undeniable; what he discovered was true. To this day, evolutionists don’t like to talk about spontaneous generation; most books skip right over it to the “first cells”. The most recent experiment “proving” you could get life to start from non-life is over 60 years old. Scientists have even turned to asteroids to give them enough time for the impossible to happen.

But, nature serves its Master whether people are willing to worship Him or not.

Let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That you might be justified in your sayings, and might overcome when you are judged. Romans 3:4

You can do Louis Pasteur’s experiment for yourself with the right supplies. This article on how to do it at Biology Junction is worth the read even if you don’t have a lab.

There’s also an interesting 7 minute video about the Swan Flask Experiment at the Education Portal.

Did you notice how much these pages sound like creationists? The people who believed in spontaneous generation are rightly seen as ignorant of reality.

I found a lot of information for this post in the Answers Research Journal article by Alan L. Gillen and Frank J. Sherwin III: Louis Pasteur’s Views on Creation, Evolution, and the Genesis of Germs

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA

The Miller-Urey Experiment: Proof for What?

 Definition of Abiogenesis: the supposed spontaneous origination of living organisms directly from lifeless matter—called also spontaneous generation

300px Louis Pasteur%2C foto av F%C3%A9lix Nadar The Miller Urey Experiment: Proof for What?

Louis Pasteur

Remember learning about Louis Pasteur? In his time, many people believed maggots just popped into life wherever meat was left out. They didn’t understand the connection between them and flies. They also thought wine fermented on its own, never thinking about yeast.

Belief in life just popping into existence without a parent is called Spontaneous Generation. Back before Jesus’ day, the Greeks and Romans already believed in it. It has never been observed and we now know it can’t happen.

But many scientists still believe it did happen, at least once, somewhere in the universe!

Scientists know people won’t take them seriously talking about spontaneous generation, so they changed the name of their belief. Now they prefer to call it “abiogenesis” which means non-life beginning.

Is abiogenesis really different? No. Which is why you don’t have kids books describing it. Instead you read about life after it already existed.

Sometimes, books will talk about an experiment scientists did back in the 1953. They say it proved you can get the building blocks for life when things are just right.

Well, that’s not really true. To get the results they were hoping for, the scientists in the Miller-Urey experiment carefully controlled everything:

300px Miller Urey experiment en.svg The Miller Urey Experiment: Proof for What?

Miller-Urey experiment (1953).

  •  The amount of light was kept low
  • The temperature was kept just right
  • The ingredients in the experiment were carefully purified
  • No one today thinks they used the right ingredients
  • Most of the chemicals formed were deadly

After all this, they did get some amino acids (what proteins are built from).

Why is the most famous experiment for abiogenesis 60 years old? So many things couldn’t work in the real world, scientists have stopped even trying to show life started on earth. Many of them who won’t give up abiogenesis are looking to outer space for answers.

In the past few years, scientists have started searching meteorites for the building blocks of life. They are even finding some real extra-terrestrial amino acids.

But, just because you have an amino acid, doesn’t mean you can start new life. Getting amino acids to combine themselves into something like a protein is a huge task even when all the right ingredients are there. In the real world, there are a lot of things which would stop amino acids from building anything fancier.

Chirality with hands The Miller Urey Experiment: Proof for What?

Chirality with hands and two enantiomers of a generic amino acid.

Even if they did, everything alive uses only half the amino acids produced by non-living reactions. Here’s how it works: amino acids are kind of like your hands; they have all the same parts but are mirror images. Cells almost only use the “left-handed” ones. But, there is always an even mixture of both outside of cells.

Any protein trying to form wouldn’t be able to separate out all the “right-handed” acids and couldn’t form properly. Even if one could somehow form, just one protein doesn’t come close to what you need for a “simple” cell.

The truth is, if you had a perfect environment with everything a cell needs to survive in just the right amounts, you still couldn’t bring it to life. A dead body isn’t going to come back to life, even with all the parts in place, once the life is gone.

Only life can create life.

And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul. Genesis 2:7

For more, check out:

Bible Science Guy: Evidence for God – Design Convinces Scientists 7

Institute for Creation Research: Origin of Life Research Still Dead

Creation Ministries International: Detailed Criticisms of the RNA World Hypothesis

Answers in Genesis: Why the Miller-Urey Research Argues Against Abiogenesis

Pasteur's Swan Flask Expieriment Diagram-Wikimedia

Abiogenesis, aka Spontaneous Generation

300px Experiment Pasteur English Abiogenesis, aka Spontaneous Generation

Illustration of swan-necked flask experiment used by Louis Pasteur to test the hypothesis of spontaneous generation.

Have you gotten to study about Louis Pasteur yet?  Besides his work on preventing germs from spoiling your milk (Pasteurization) and immunization, he is most famous for proving that spontaneous generation is impossible.So what is spontaneous generation, and what do evolution and creationism have to say about it?

Spontaneous generation is the idea that life comes from non-life. From the time of the Greeks, people thought something like this must happen to make freshwater eels because they never saw any eggs.  People in the 1800s had the idea that maggots just came to life on pieces of meat from nowhere.  Pasteur did experiments that showed that the maggots come from the eggs that flies lay. Without flies you have no maggots.

Scientists have never seen a plant or animal that didn’t have a parent come to life.

Creationism says that God is the only one who never came into being since He IS, and time itself is one of God’s designs. This means that God goes infinitely backwards and forward in time and sideways (He’s everywhere at once).  So, all genealogies of living things have God at the end of the list of great, great, grandparents.  Luke says this clearly about people in Luke 3:38.  God is the ultimate ‘parent’ and we are all His offspring Acts 17:28.

Evolution has to say that life came from mindless non-life.  They MUST believe in spontaneous generation.  This makes evolutionists very uncomfortable, so they’ve renamed this process “abiogenic origin” [life from non-life].  Sounds so much smarter doesn’t it?  But does this idea hold water?  If your eyes can handle crossing, check this page out:   The people at Clermont College, U. of Cincinnati were nice enough to highlight the phrase that matters at the bottom of the page–7014649329 727fd2fc8d m Abiogenesis, aka Spontaneous Generation

“Note that while some of these steps have been demonstrated in a lab, NOBODY HAS EVER MADE A LIVING CELL IN A LAB. While people have demonstrated bits and pieces of this process, the whole process has never been done in a lab. Rather, this is a theory of how things might have happened.”

Especially notice the fuzzy phrase, theory of how things might have happened.

Because this whole idea is so impossible, evolutionists try to avoid discussions about where the first life came from altogether.  Check this debate intro from Creation Today:

“[The guy on the evolution side] defended the evolution worldview and even admitted that he pretended to believe in God to avoid answering the question of abiogenesis…. It took until near the end of the debate for him to admit he really was an atheist. We believe that his invention of a god for that evening was purely to avoid the issue of where life came from as he stated several times he was just discussing common descent and that abiotic origin was not evolution.”

Bacteriarazorback Abiogenesis, aka Spontaneous GenerationThat’s because it DIDN’T happen that way!!!

God is so great, so smart that He made even the ‘simplest’ living things so complicated no one could miss that they were created.

God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands;  Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; Acts 17:24,25